Teachers are perceived as role models in the community, and the laws and regulations that mandate appropriate standards of conduct reflect that expectation. Failure to comply with these standards can lead to adverse employment action, certification sanctions and possible prosecution for criminal violations.
Sexual contact or indecent exposure with a minor is a felony that requires the perpetrator to register as a sex offender. It also is a felony for any school district employee to engage in a sexual relationship with a student, even if that student is of the legal age of consent. This prohibition includes students enrolled in schools where the teacher is not employed. A person who is a member of the Teacher Retirement System and is convicted of certain felonies that involve sexual abuse of a student or minor will be ineligible to receive a service retirement annuity from the retirement system.
State law requires that the Texas Education Agency maintain and make available through an internet portal a registry of persons not eligible for employment in a school district, district of innovation, open-enrollment charter school, or other charter entity, education service center, or shared services arrangement based on misconduct or criminal history. Private schools are provided access to the registry. In addition, the State Board for Educator Certification is empowered to sanction the teaching credentials of a certified educator who is found to have engaged in misconduct. Misconduct that could subject an educator to sanctions includes, but is not limited to, complaints in which there is evidence that the person abused or committed an unlawful act with a student or minor, was involved in a romantic relationship, or solicited or engaged in sexual contact with a student or minor. The State Board for Educator Certification may also sanction certified educators who are convicted of crimes that relate to the education profession or engage in any conduct that indicates that the person is unworthy to instruct or supervise the youth of the state.
An educator who is the subject of a report alleging specified misconduct is entitled to a hearing on the merits of the allegations. When a report of alleged misconduct is sent by the superintendent or other authorized personnel to TEA, the agency must promptly send notification to the educator who is the subject of the report informing the educator that they have 10 days to request a hearing and provide a written response.
If the educator does not submit a written response to show cause why the agency should not pursue an investigation, the agency will post notice on the educator’s virtual certificate that the person is under investigation for alleged misconduct. If the educator does not request a hearing in a timely fashion, the commissioner shall make a determination as to alleged misconduct based on the report submitted and the investigation conducted by TEA staff. If the commissioner determines that the educator engaged in the described misconduct, their name will be added to the do-not-hire registry and sanctions may be imposed on the educator’s certificate. If the educator requests a hearing and the final decision determines that they did not engage in the alleged misconduct, the agency will immediately remove from the virtual certificate the information indicating the educator is under investigation for alleged misconduct.
A school district must complete an investigation into allegations of educator misconduct, even if the educator resigns from the school district. School districts must notify the parent or guardian of a student with whom an educator allegedly engaged in an improper relationship, regardless of whether the educator resigned or was terminated.
The federal Every Student Succeeds Act prohibits school employees from aiding a potential school employee in obtaining a new job if there is probable cause to believe that the latter has engaged in sexual misconduct with a minor or student. Applicants for many school district positions must submit a pre-employment affidavit disclosing a charge, adjudication or conviction based on an inappropriate relationship with a minor.
If an educator has been found to have engaged in sexual conduct or a romantic relationship with a student or minor, regardless of age or enrollment status in the district, the State Board for Educator Certification will permanently revoke that educator’s teaching certificate.
Solicitation of a sexual or romantic relationship with a student also can result in adverse employment action and certificate sanctions, even if the relationship is not ultimately consummated.
The criminal prohibition of online solicitation of a minor includes communications between a school district employee and a student. A person commits this offense if they knowingly solicit a minor to meet with another person with the intent that the minor will engage in sexual contact with the person. Conviction of online solicitation of a minor is a felony.
SBEC may sanction the teaching certificate of an educator who has engaged in deliberate or repeated acts that can be reasonably interpreted as soliciting a sexual or romantic relationship. Prohibited acts include, but are not limited to:
Educators should take care to avoid situations in which professional boundaries become poorly defined. Inviting students to your home, meeting them for social activities that are not school-sponsored, or developing personal relationships with them can create the perception of inappropriate conduct. Avoid such situations with students in the absence of previously existing and proper social relationships with them.
An educator who has reasonable cause to believe that any student or minor may be a victim of sexual abuse is required to make a report to the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services within 24 hours of becoming aware of the possibility of the abuse. For more information, see child abuse or neglect reporting requirements.
School districts are required by law to adopt a policy regarding electronic communications between employees and students. Most districts’ policies extend standards of conduct to use of electronic media and social networking sites, and the Code of Ethics imposes limitations on such communications.
Educators are held to the same standards of conduct in their use of electronic media and social networking as for any other public communication. All communications with students or minors, whether electronic or in person, should be professional and appropriate.
Many districts have even adopted policies specifying that teachers may communicate with their own children and their children’s friends using personal social networking sites, but may not do so with current or former students with whom there is no separate social relationship.
Some districts have policies that designate only specific individuals who may send text messages to students and place time limitations on when educators may communicate with students. TCTA-initiated legislation says that teachers may decline to disclose their personal email or cellphone number to students.
Information about inappropriate relationships, boundaries and communications between educators and students must be included in the content presented in each educator preparation program.
Continuing education requirements for certificate renewal specify that instruction regarding understanding of appropriate relationships, boundaries and communications between educators and students is one of the topics that must be covered in no more than 25% of the CPE hours required of a teacher every five years.
Teacher communications regarding school business are public information. Public information is not always subject to disclosure to the general public, but still must be maintained because some people may have a right of access (parents generally can access their child’s records, for example.) This means that any use of personal devices such as sending text messages to other school employees, parents or students constitutes public information that must be preserved and backed up in accordance with local policies or forwarded to an appropriate person, such as the district’s public information officer.
The fact that public information is on a personal device does not give a supervisor or school district the right to search a device, but an employee who is in possession of public records on their personal device is considered a custodian of records for that information and must preserve it and provide it to the school or district upon request.
Copyright© 2025 Texas Classroom Teachers Association® The Educated Choice® All rights reserved.